fc3741365c
* Add Swagger spec test script * Fix Swagger spec errors not related to statuses with polls * Add API tests that post a status with a poll * Fix creating a status with a poll from form params * Fix Swagger spec errors related to statuses with polls (this is the last error) * Fix Swagger spec warnings not related to unused definitions * Suppress a duplicate list update params definition that was somehow causing wrong param names * Add Swagger test to CI - updates Drone config - vendorizes go-swagger - fixes a file extension issue that caused the test script to generate JSON instead of YAML with the vendorized version * Put `Sample: ` on its own line everywhere * Remove unused id param from emojiCategoriesGet * Add 5 more pairs of profile fields to account update API Swagger * Remove Swagger prefix from dummy fields It makes the generated code look weird * Manually annotate params for statusCreate operation * Fix all remaining Swagger spec warnings - Change some models into operation parameters - Ignore models that already correspond to manually documented operation parameters but can't be trivially changed (those with file fields) * Documented that creating a status with scheduled_at isn't implemented yet * sign drone.yml * Fix filter API Swagger errors * fixup! Fix filter API Swagger errors --------- Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>
3.2 KiB
Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
Our Pledge
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
Our Standards
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment include:
- Using welcoming and inclusive language
- Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
- Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
- Focusing on what is best for the community
- Showing empathy towards other community members
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
- The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or advances
- Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
- Public or private harassment
- Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic address, without explicit permission
- Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
Our Responsibilities
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
Scope
This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting the project team at ivan+abuse@flanders.co.nz. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the project's leadership.
Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 1.4, available at http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4